After what I have stated, anyone can tell that Knowledge rests on the Void in order to be known, precisely because the Knowledges Self is the Being, the opposite of the Void, but, and I recommend attention, the opposite of the Void does not mean that is is that something, that in fact has a subsistence meaning, no Not in the least.
If we didnasasasat know the notion of past, we wouldnasasasat know that of future either et despite all that we swim into the waves of the present without knowing if it really exists and how long it lasts. A second, a fraction of it, or it does not really exist the future becoming instantaneously past.
There is no Good without Evil as there cannot be Evil without Good. By wanting Good, Manasasasas Sacred Self looks towards the future, towards Destiny and this is why Man wants Good to be granted to the future, to the yet unknown Destiny that once exposed to knowledge becomes past where it seldom identifies with Good.
Holiness, Faith and Religion can never be institutionalized because they are the individual property of every man, they are a part of each manaasasaiasasaass Sacred Self, and their socialization can be done only by accepting the individuality of each such Sacred Self. And such an acceptance of the individuality does not allow in any circumstance their institutionalization.
How much does man need Holiness Only through the true Holiness, Man will really change the image of the world, but not the world too. How can this be done It is one thing to look at the world with an aggrieved soul, confused and tormented by all sorts of frustrations and anguishes, and it is another thing to look at the same world full of happiness, fulfilled and optimistic. Are not these two different worlds even if both scenes occur in the same world Is it not a major difference between these ways of seeing the world, between a miserable and a fulfilled man This is why it is not Destiny the one that can be changed, but the way manaasasaiasasaass self sees it. This is the difference which consists of the otherwise imaginary Free Will of the man.
The saints thus receive qualities that are forbidden to man, and these qualities are owed precisely to the fact that man is capable of loving and the ultimate form of love is the Holiness. What is the Destiny if not an Image of the Print of our Creating Factor, which is love Through love, man comes closer and closer to the image of the Destiny, which thus turns into Holiness for Man. The Holiness becomes the most plausible and closest image of the Destiny and Holiness is, incredibly, the one to whom it is asked to intervene on Destiny. Who else is asked to intervene on Destiny if not Destiny that thus receives the meaning of Holiness through manaasasaiasasaass Love, being the Image of love reflected in the Infinite Mirror of Knowledge Who is the manIs he not a piece of this image of Love which is the Destiny So the man is Love or image of Love The man is Love because the image of Love is manaasasaiasasaass Destiny. Is there a difference between the man and his Destiny There is no such difference. Then the man is both Love and Image of this Love in this world.
Is an intervention of the saints possible compared to an intervention of the man over Destiny Is the saint - which man defined as a superior stage of that manaasasaiasasaass love - capable of really having Free Will To answer such a question, we shall have to first define in details the notion of saint. It is well known by all what saints are in different popular mythologies, but what are the saints in coaxialism The saints are a superior form of love given by the man to them, nothing else than an Image of the Man, an alter ego, but precisely due to love which is the ultimate form of love, saints receive certain supernatural through which they could act on the plantaasasaiasasaass destiny. Once man is an Image through the Image of his own Destiny, Saints becomes an image of the image, of this Destiny, so they identify to the creator of the image, to the one that can catch the image of the Destiny from outside it, being able to intervene on the Destiny which is the image of the Unique Accidental Occurrence that infinitely succeeds. Even if the creator can intervene on the Image of the Destiny, he will not do it, because it would become an Intended Occurrence and it would disappear forever.
I repeat, not the man does it, because he has nothing to say on his own destiny, because how the history of the human past is written and that book cannot be changed, so is the future which will be a part of the history and his book neither can be changed. The only free way given to man to act on his destiny is by love. The man can and has the capacity to love or hate. By having love man also has Holiness and Faith and thus he becomes religious.Everything that is Holy receives other new meanings throughout the historical evolution. The term aasasaiasaasaevolutionaasasaiasasaas, as I have said it, is inadequate to a world which has a destiny, but it is the closes to what I want to express now. The saints are those who receive supernatural powers from the man. They can do Good or they can intervene in the human destiny.
How else can we influence the social evolution or could we speed up the return of the man to the Sacred Self We people cannot influence in any way the future evolution of mankind, because everything that is aasasaiasaasameantaasasaias to happen will happen, because all of these Intended Occurrences are successions of the Accidental and Unique Occurrence. Since everything is already written, figuratively speaking we cannot go against destiny, nor react in one way or another. Even if we try to change the Illusion of our Life, it will only change depending on the Destiny to which it obeys and not on our illusory actions. Nevertheless, the fact that the man begins to wake up from the millennial numbness in which he was, he starts not to accept the bloody Christ, tortured on the wood of the cross of his own ineffable destiny is a good sign that destiny - and not man - gives to man.
The image of the tormented man is taken and reproduced in the dirtiest political ways by the institutions of the church, and through this image they squeeze money and a part of the souls of the people in order to convert them to a faith that no longer is part of the ultimate form of manaasasaiasasaass love, to faith of the obedience to groupings, official, governmental or any other occult institutions and hierarchies. The church stole the image of the Crucified Christ, which is the image of the holiness of man because it wanted this image precisely due to the fact that man found himself again in it. Church found itself that much in this image that it reached the ultimate stage of manaasasaiasasaass love, holiness. Then it could have been a favourable moment to reunite man with his Sacred Self, if this image would have not been stolen from the man by the church and subsequently institutionalized, becoming eventually the image which will enslave man.
This is why man creates his own universes when he Knows them, and these universes can never be prior to man because they are mere images of the vanity of vanities that will make whole manaasasaiasasaass thirst of solidarity with the Infinite, the Absolute and the Plenitude dusted by so much stardust of its own illusory image of life. To claim that Manaasasaiasasaass God is independent of him is a fiction, because this God is a God of the manaasasaiasasaass Illusion of Life because it cannot be any other way, because this the only way in which man can determine and recognize it, because only this way can this God exist.